Very best safest distance from a 5G cell Structure?
If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can cause issues for users.
safe distance from cell tower is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could result in various possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis and skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, but not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe location from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther you are from it.
Although this may sound like something that's good however, people living in close proximity to towers could be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
But, what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower found that people who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. It is also the most important organ in the human body. https://note1s.com/notes/DRRT9P is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their limit of exposure to the local SARs based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.