What is the safest distance from the 5G cell Tower system?
If you've ever walked through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
They are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower 's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This could result in a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest range from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the further the tower is.
Although this may sound like a good idea but the truth is that those living close to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those living further away from the antennas.
This study found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin serves as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ of the human body. It is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).
what is a safe distance from a cell tower ignores the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effects of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.