What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?
If you've ever walked through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.
They are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can cause problems for people.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower
Have you ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the further you are from it.
While this sounds like an ideal idea however, people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those living further distance from them.
But, the study found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.
This is because radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin acts as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal as well as the effects of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In what is a safe distance from a cell tower , psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.